Tuesday, January 31, 2006
 

I'm not sure if this is the greatest thing in the world, but it's close.

Analogcabin @ 9:55 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

 

If there's an upside to today's terrible postal shooting, it's that the seven people killed will be spared Bush's State of the Union address tonight.

I'm not saying that watching a man shift and stammer uncomfortably while he lies to 300 million people is always bad. James Frey's recent appearance on Oprah was fairly entertaining. But when the liar is responsible for the death of tens of thousands of people, it schadenfraude is on us.

Analogcabin @ 9:25 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Monday, January 30, 2006
 

In my opinion, lately there's been some confusion about what exactly news is. By my definition, and therefore the definitive definition, news is an event or happening not widely known. Hence, the etomology of the word news -- the plural of new. If it was a bunch of stuff we already knew about, it would be called an oldscast.

Here are two examples that I think illustrate the difference between news and olds well. That Exxon Mobil was able to extract the largest profit ever recorded during these times of high oil prices and an extraordinarily helpful administration is news. That's because, though I know we've all been feeling vaguely fucked over, it was impossible to say who was doing it and exactly how well they were doing it. So, that it was Exxon and that they were doing it record-breakingly well is news.

On the other hand, that Bush supporters tend to be more racially biased is not news. Sure, there was a study that seems to have proven it, but this information is so ubiquitous anecdotally that it's the very definition of olds.

Analogcabin @ 3:37 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

 

Everyone's favorite pock rocker, Bryan Adams, yesterday played a benefit concert in Karachi, Pakistan, the proceeds of which will go to help rebuild schools destroyed in the recent earthquake. According to the article, Adams "moved the audience with 'Summer of 69,'" and so I thought it appropriate to compare Pakistan's tumultuous summer of 1969 with some of the events detailed in Adams' song.

In Bryan Adams' summer of '69, he got his first real six-string, which he bought at a five and dime.

In Pakistan's summer of '69, American diplomats attempted to leverage a sharp decline in Sino-Soviet relations by secretly contacting the Chinese, by way of Pakistan.

In Bryan Adams' summer of '69, he and some guys from school had a band and they tried real hard.

In Pakistan's summer of '69, the government declined to renew the United States' lease on the Peshawar military facility in response to a lack of US support during the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War.

In Bryan Adams' summer of '69, Jimmy quit and Jody got married.

In Pakistan's summer of '69, widespread riots led to the transfer of power from Ayub Khan to General Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, who declared himself preisdent and "chief martial law administrator." By 1969, Pakistan had been under martial law for 11 years.


Canadian rocker Bryan Adams, left, and Pakistani dictator Yahya Khan, right, both of whom wished that summer could have last forever.

Analogcabin @ 10:21 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Friday, January 27, 2006
 

On a customer service note, I apologize to those of you who, thirsting for brilliance, attempted to visit The Spoonbender in the last 12 hours and found yourselves unable. Once again the enemies of truth among us have attempted to silence me. See the below from my very wonderful and highly recommended hosting company:

Dear TPKI, LLC.:

Your server is currently under a massive Distributed Denial of Service attack. We are taking every measure possible to minimize the effects of this attack, however there are times when your web site may not load or load extremely slow.

While there is no set limit how long these attacks may last, usually they last a few hours.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and are working hard on minimizing effects of this attack.

This does not affect your regular mail services.

Thank you.


This ham-handed counter attack is surely in response to our great victory yesterday. But rest assured, my many fans, we will prevail. For those who wield the Mighty Sword of the Lord, no man can oppose.

And I wield it, baby. In my pants.

Analogcabin @ 7:50 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Thursday, January 26, 2006
 

This is fantastic news. It's a terrible shame that Chris Penn isn't alive to see it.

Analogcabin @ 8:58 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Wednesday, January 25, 2006
 

In a society that appears to be completely comfortable accepting James Frey's proven bullshit as an inspirational memoir on the reality of addiction, it's no wonder that we're enraged by Joel Stein being honest.

Sometimes I wish I were Chris Penn.

Analogcabin @ 3:49 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

 

Analogcabin @ 8:26 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Tuesday, January 24, 2006
 

There are only three explanations for the behavior that resulted in Joshua Vannoy's humiliation. And because it's your lucky day, I've outlined them below.

Explanation One: Joshua Vannoy wore a Denver Broncos jersey to his high school in the Pittsburgh suburbs two days before the Broncos played the Steelers in the AFC Championship Game because he's blind and wasn't aware it was a Broncos jersey.

Explanation Two: Joshua Vannoy wore a Denver Broncos jersey to his high school in the Pittsburgh suburbs two days before the Broncos played the Steelers in the AFC Championship Game because, as he claims, he's a huge John Elway fan and is compelled to support his retired hero under even the most uncomfortable circumstances.

Explanation Three: Joshua Vannoy wore a Denver Broncos jersey to his high school in the Pittsburgh suburbs two days before the Broncos played the Steelers in the AFC Championship Game because his parents don't pay enough attention to him, so he tries to make up for it by doing obnoxious things.

Little Joshua is wearing glasses in the picture below, so I think we can safely exclude Explanation One. After all, the blind wearing untinted glasses is a bit like the impotent wearing condoms or the deaf wearing headphones. If we take what Joshua says and accept Explanation Two at face value, then he deserves all of the abuse he received and more. It's unnatural for a boy to admire a horse-faced ex-football player that much. And as for Explanation Three, let me relate to you a story from my past. When I was about 16 I dated a girl whose parents were fairly Catholic. Her mother would occasionally drag this girl to church. On those occasions this girl enjoyed wearing a Bad Religion t-shirt with her heavy eye shadow and knee high combat boots.

That she was exactly the kind of Catholic girl you suspect is beside the point. I bring up the story because I think we all can see that it would have been silly for her to get upset had people responded strongly to her for wearing a shirt meant to illicit strong response. The only thing different about Joshua Vannoy is that he's never had sex with me in the back of a white Jeep Grand Cherokee.

As far as you know.


Joshua Vannoy, above, is like a sick little Catholic girl, except without any appeal whatsoever.

Analogcabin @ 11:57 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Monday, January 23, 2006
 

Lest there were any doubt at all, the verdict is in and I am a dork.

I know that you're surprised and perhaps a little upset. You imagine me as a roughly handsome journeyman. A breaker of hearts, hymen, and hypocrasies. A cowboy on a steel horse. Seer of a million horrible, acned internet faces, and a rocker of them all. But take me off that pedestal, little lady, for I listened to a Lost podcast this weekend. And cross that Sharpie-rendering of my logo off your binder, little man, because I loved it so much that I subscribed.

I know. Really fucking pathetic. Not only did I listen to a podcast. I listened to one about Lost. And not only did I listen to it, but I subscribed to it. And if I'm being honest, not just one. I subscribed to a number of podcasts.

I realize that it's the zenith of dorkiness, but I can't lie. I listen this podcast. I follow up the links they reference. I formulate my own theories. I've considered calling their comment line.

Analogcabin @ 4:11 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Friday, January 20, 2006
 

I live in Northern California -- Home of the Tech-Wealthy White Guy and His Demi-Asian Wife. We're best known for our marijuana and holier than thou liberalism. Maybe it's because both only grow in very rich, bullshit-laden soil and a moist, moderate climate convenient to both skiing and surfing. But where else would I call home? Someplace with poor people?

Up here, much is being made of Google's refusal to provide the government with various search records because of concerns over users' privacy. AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo! have already complied with the government's request, so Google's move has bolstered their already heroic, "do no evil" image to positively angelic levels. It's the perfect Northern California story -- a high tech company that appears to be making a fuck load of money doing, um, something takes a liberal stance in the face of pressure from the big, bad, warmongering fascists in Washington.

So the public sentiment is strongly in support of Google's decision. And anyone who reads The Spoonbender regularly realizes that I'm not one to disagree with the public sentiment. I mean, what Google is doing is, very simply, the right thing to do. Who knows what personal information is contained in those searches? And, even if there's none, what will the government ask for next? The bottom line is that I don't want anyone knowing that I Google "superglued labia" on a semi-regular basis, and I'm sure you don't either. If that privacy means a few kids have to get diddled, then I say so be it. You've got to learn somehow, right?

But before we all get too high on our self-satisfaction and weed, let's not forget that Goggle's stance isn't always so inspiringly anti-establishment. Especially if you happen to be part of the unlucky 20% of the world's population living in China. Because if you are, Google's not all that interested in protecting your privacy. They're not even interested in providing you with information on little things like democracy, freedom, or the Dalai Lama. If you're one of those people and you want privacy, your best bet is to be a hot chick, to hop the first shipping container to San Francisco, and to troll the Best Buy parking lot for a geek in a Boxster.

Analogcabin @ 10:15 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Thursday, January 19, 2006
 

As I'm wont to do when in the mood to read something I won't understand, I visited The Corsair this morning and saw the below picture of Val Kilmer.

My question for you is this: When did Val Kilmer become John Ritter?

Analogcabin @ 8:15 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Wednesday, January 18, 2006
 

I don't have a lot of time to post today, but rather than leave you hanging, I thought I'd quickly share with you one of the things that's been on my mind recently.

They don't make movies like they used to, and I think that's a shame. Specifically, I'm talking about The Cannonball Run. Not long ago I recommended an ignorant friend rent this classic. He did and, as I predicted, was delighted. We were inspired to conversation, as friends sometimes are.

We agreed that the days of eschewing a script in favor of producing a movie by assembling a cast of stars and a lot of booze have passed, but that they should be revived. We further agreed that remaking The Cannonball Run would be a fine way to initiate that revival.

So he and I have been discussing the cast, and below is what we have so far.

Vince Vaughn in the Dean Martin role, and Chris Tucker in the Sammy Davis role. George Clooney in the Reynolds role opposite Jack Black in the Dom DeLuise role.

It's genius, I know. If you have thoughts, feel free to shove them up your ass or put them in the comments.

Analogcabin @ 2:44 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Tuesday, January 17, 2006
 

So I'm sure that this story has been referenced on countless blogs today, but I really don't care. The bottom line is that, until you've been referenced on The Spoonbender, you haven't been referenced at all.

The tale is one of woe. A man and his girlfriend, both British, and their parrot, Gray, live in an apartment, or as they might say pastily, "a flat." One day the parrot begins echoing the phrase, "I love you, Gary." The man, being neither Gary nor retarded, suspects the worst. He confronts his girlfriend. She, either unable or unwilling to conjure a tale of her frenzied appreciation of Gary Player's performance in the British Open, confirms his suspicions. The pair part ways. Later, the man gives up the parrot when it continues to echo the phrase, mocking his very cuckholdery to the soul.

What bothers me is the woman's reaction to hearing that her ex had been forced to give up the pet. She commented to The Guardian, "I am surprised to hear he got rid of that bird. He spent more time talking to it than he did to me."

How about some motherfucking sympathy? You whore. I'd accept a smug response like that if the guy had knocked your teeth or forced you to bang syphilitic buddy or something. But his big crime is that he didn't talk to you enough. So instead of simply breaking up with him, you decide that the appropriate course of action is to bring some idiot home from work and suck his cock in front of the fucking parrot. I hope you get hanta virus.


It's not about the fucking parrot, above. It's about showing a little fucking respect and preserving the thread of dignity we as a species retain.

Analogcabin @ 8:40 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Thursday, January 12, 2006
 

The AM pointed me in the direction of this piece in Slate that does a better job capturing the idea I was trying to get across yesterday: that Frey's lies are worse than the standard manipulation to which we're all subjected daily. It's the most blatant and offensive kind of hypocrisy, and if we're willing to excuse him as easily as Oprah was, we might as well lube up, because there's obviously no indignity we're unwilling to suffer.

Analogcabin @ 11:43 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Wednesday, January 11, 2006
 

For days I've resisted discussing the James Frey scandal, but the constant calls for comment from various important news outlets and my retarded readership finally has proven too much to resist. And so below you will find my elucidation of the entire morass. And I will endeavor to use small words and short sentences so that you all will understand.

There are those of us who will greet news that Random House is offering refunds to A Million Little Pieces readers with glee. They will see the move as a triumph of morality over money in a world sorely lacking that kind of triumph. And there are those of us who will see the move cynically: triage ahead of Oprah's impending indictment of Frey's deceit, apology, and advertisement of the refund offer. Better to refund 10% of the Frey earnings than to risk being on the bad side of the Oprah Book Club colassas. In the end, Frey, who, granted, more likely had his substantial ego exploited by the publisher than duped anyone into believing the wealthy son of a Whirlpool executive ever actually did much in the way of crack-smoking, will be the fall guy for exactly the kind of wink-and-nod conspiracy that fuels our every commercial interaction.

And the question that many are asking is this: So what? So Frey lied. Memoir or not, it's a book and he's a writer. It's hardly the first memoir in which the truth's been stretched, bent, or broken. Who was hurt by all of this? What's the difference between A Million Little Pieces and JT Leroy's Sarah or even A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius? And the answer is nothing. Despite that he tried and couldn't get it published as fiction, it doesn't really matter to me that his memoir is fictional. The book, taken on it's own, is completely irrelevant.

What matters is Frey and what's happened in the wake of the book's publishing. I don't know what confluence of forces resulted in him becoming the poster boy for "non-traditional recovery" from addiction, but he has. And it's a role he's embraced through speaking engagements and interviews like those that appeared on Oprah. It's your pathetic life, James, so go ahead and exaggerate. But don't then use those exaggerations to make yourself a role model for people in real need. Or, if you do, expect the shit to hit the fan eventually.

So who gets hurt? Those people. People who think tattooing some stupid fucking acronym on your arm and being obnoxious will help you quit crack. Who else gets hurt? The people described in the book as his crack-smoking cohorts or his racist cop tormentors. Whether their names were changed or not, people have and will continue to figure out who Frey described. And those characters will have to defend their non-fictional lives for years to come. They're not getting paid a dime.

JT Leroy, the nonexistant author to whom Frey has been compared often over these past few days, does not make appearances at truck stops and gives lectures about how to break free of underaged gay trucker hooking. That's the difference.

Analogcabin @ 12:03 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Tuesday, January 10, 2006
 

I don't know whether to blame author Art Spiegelman, Reuters, or Yahoo!, but I think the headine Critics Hot for Gay Cowboy Film 'Brokeback Mountain' is childish.

I also think the below alternatives would be childish.

Critics Hard Pressed to Spank Gay Cowboy Film 'Brokeback Mountain'

Critics Throb with Excitement for Gay Cowboy Film 'Brokeback Mountain'

Critics Grease Way for Gay Cowboy Film 'Brokeback Mountain'

Critics Erupt with Praise, Cum for Gay Cowboy Film 'Brokeback Mountain'


Jake Gyllenhaal, above, looking vaguely embarrassed about having received an award for portraying a gay cowboy so convincingly.

Analogcabin @ 1:35 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Monday, January 09, 2006
 

This morning as I clicked and skimmed my way through CNN.com, I found this tale of a town shocked by a recent "racial shooting." The town is Moorhead, Minnesota, and I'm not totally sure why it's shocked. Right there in the second paragraph of the story it says that James Waltz, the accused, told his neighbor he wanted to shoot a black person. It seems to me that the most shocking thing about his shooting of Ricky Davis, the unfortunate black person who made Waltz's aspiration a reality, is that shooting a black person was the dream he shared with his neighbor. How did that conversation go?

NEIGHBOR: You know, Jay, I've always wanted to have sex with a black chick.

JAMES WALTZ: Yeah. I've always wanted to shoot a hole in one.

NEIGHBOR: I didn't know you golfed.


But that's not what really caught my eye about the story. What set me adrift in a memory bliss, as PM Dawn would say, was the mention of the town of International Falls, Minnesota.

Why? you bleat like a chicklet after some regurgiworm.

Because when I was younger, I spent a good deal of time with a nanny who hailed from International Falls.

That's right, fans. Pull up a mat and shift on your ass uncomfortably, because it's time to delight at the tiniest taste of True Tales from the Author of The Spoonbender's Past.

It was the summer after my sophomore year of college, and I was unemployed. I'd been able to convince my parents that a three-week job as an orientation counselor at my college would prevent any local employers from hiring me. Supportive and kind people that they were, they suggested that I go to bartending school -- drinking being something that I clearly enjoyed and was good at. As you can imagine, the bartending school schedule is one that allows plenty of time for other pursuits. For me, these included smoking pot in the afternoons and drinking prodigiously in the evenings.

My companion in these pursuits was a fine fellow named Kevin. He'd recently left Penn State for reasons I never entirely understood, though I suspect it might have had to do with the violent menacing of a black roommate who insisted on listening to Janet Jackson's hit "Again" again and again. Other than a one shift stint at Arby's, during which I visited in time to hear him snarl venomously, "Do you want horsey sauce with that?" at a drive-through customer, Kevin was also unemployed and made for a fine and willing cohort.

At this point in the story I think it's important to point out that, though Kevin and I were only about 20, our lifestyle did not help my self-image. Nor did it his. We enjoyed ourselves immensely, but weeks of being surrounded by friends rushing off to one job or another made us feel like unambitious and lazy burn-outs. In retrospect I understand that none of my friends were interning in Congress or anything, and that the opportunity cost of working a minimum wage job that summer would have more than negated the money we'd have earned. But young and stupid as we were, our unemployment was the topic of many reflective, stoned discussions.

Until, that is, the nanny arrived.

It should be understand that nannies weren't common where I grew up. It was hardly a poor neighborhood, but it was decidedly working class. It was the kind of place where the hiring of nannies or maids was considered the foolish extravagance of the rich and idle. Or perhaps of the gays. In any case, it was frowned on. Which is why the nanny's arrival was immediately noticed by Kevin and me.

Of course, she worked for the family that lived directly next door to Kevin, so proximity helped in the noticing. And I think she introduced herself to us one day, which also kind of brought her to our attention.

I can't remember her name now, nor what she looked like. She was attractive-ish, but nothing all that special. And neither Kevin nor I were after her in that way you'd guess we might have been. She always seemed vaguely interested, but in both of us equally. Which, looking back now, is kind of creepy if not unexpected from a nanny who spends much of her time with a couple of unemployed stoners. What really fueled our friendship with the nanny was that she was always willing to drive us places and buy us drinks. I guess you could say she was a born caretaker.

The last time I saw the nanny was pulling out of my parents' driveway. We'd spent the evening at a horrible local club called Rumours. After making out with her in the women's bathroom, she and Kevin pulled me, toes dragging, out to the car at the request of the management. During the drive home I vomited blood onto myself -- the one and only time in my life I've vomited blood.

As I said, the nanny was from International Falls, Minnesota, and she used to tell Kevin and I how cold it got up there. In the years since I've wondered what it's like to make out with someone, and then to have them vomit blood on themself. It must be awkward.

Analogcabin @ 11:07 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Friday, January 06, 2006
 

A word to my friends the Taiwanese: rent Troy before you wake up with a wild-eyed Chinaman in a panda suit sticking a Kalashnikov in your face. I don't know if it comes subtitled with those silly little pictures you claim are writing, but get it anyway. While you all were still taking opium naps in a rice paddy, we were learning lessons the hard way. No need to repeat our mistakes.


Pandas are more adorable, harder to resist, and, therefore, more insidious than horses.

Analogcabin @ 10:34 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Thursday, January 05, 2006
 

It's that time once again. What time?, you retardedly drool. Time for bloggers the web over to pretend like they're not begging for a Bloggie nomination by lamely camouflaging their pleas with cynicism, aloofness, and conveniently reciprocated plugs for other blogs. And to celebrate this great tradition, I'm proud to announce The Spoonbender.com's first annual Bloggie Hoggie awards, so named because it's vaguely insulting and it rhymes. To nominate a particularly grubby post, simply link to it in the comments. It's easy. I'll even start things off with this gem on Daily Kos.

For my money, any blogger that doesn't greet the news they've won a Bloggie by posting video of himself taking a shit on the award itself is the kind of fucking loser who can barely conceal his aspiration to someday meet Andy Dick.

And furthermore, why do you say "taking a shit" when you're really leaving one. I mean, it makes sense to use take in the phrase "taking a picture," for example, because in an abstract way you are kind of taking that image with you. But "taking a shit?" That's exactly what you're not doing.

Analogcabin @ 9:42 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Wednesday, January 04, 2006
 

Concerned citizens of the world, listen up, if you can. Doorknob Pete Townshend, the legendary Who guitarist who must have found the time to become an otologist between stints as a Broadway producer and kiddie porn cyber vigilante, has finally spoken-out about the iPod craze. His diagnosis? Those headphones are going to leave teenagers' hearing a wasteland.

Townshend's concern is over the use of headphones, the in-studio use of which he blames for his own hearing loss. Presumably Townshend was able to rule-out decades of flailing away in front of a twenty foot tall stacks of Marshalls as a cause after rigorous study and clinical trials. Never one to shirk responsibility, Townshend messianically warned:

I have unwittingly helped to invent and refine a type of music that makes its principal components deaf. Hearing loss is a terrible thing because it cannot be repaired. If you use an iPod or anything like it, or your child uses one, you MAY [childish emphasis his] be OK... But my intuition tells me there is terrible trouble ahead.

Unfortunately, it's doubtful the terrible trouble will come soon enough to spare us all from having to hear about next year's Who reunion tour, announced today on Townshend's website.


Dr. Townshend, above, didn't before he did, and now we're all left to suffer the consequences.

Analogcabin @ 11:48 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------

Tuesday, January 03, 2006
 

I hate to make light of the tragic death of House of Freaks frontman Bryan Harvey and his family, so I won't. Instead, I'll just share with you this delightful little nugget from the article:

"I yelled out, and no one answered, so I figured they all must be on a walk or something," said Johnny Hott, a bandmate from House of Freaks.

Analogcabin @ 4:12 PM
Permalink |

-------------------------

 

It's the third day of 2006, and the first decade of the first century of the second millennium that matters is officially on the wane. If you're like me, you've spent the past few days trying to figure out what that means. But you're not like me, are you? You're foolish and intellectually lazy, thoughtless and shallow, and above all horny for me. That's why you come here. So allow me to do your thinking for you. You not what they say: Don't fix what still barely works, even if it is the new year.

Six years ago we threaded the needle, or that's what we were told. Y2K had lingered ominously, threatening everything from corrupting our calendar programs to collapsing the world economy. Sure, it seems ridiculous in our wizened retrospective, hardened as we are by terrorism, war, oil, the impending demise of Whatevs.org, and what we now recognize is our painfully undramatic slide toward Armageddon. But fear of the new millennium was very real then, especially among the gullible. To wit: I worked with a man who liquidated his assets, and converted them to gold bars prior to the new year. What he planned to do with gold bars in the wake of the apocalypse, I'm not sure. I always thought a better choice would be gas or soup or something.

In an interesting side note, years later I saw him interviewed on CNN. Apparently his kidneys had failed and he was donated a pre-owned one by another of my former coworkers.

But back to the subject at hand -- our progress, or alarming lack of it, since calendars turned to 2000. Now I realize this topic is too large to cover in a single post on which I plan to spend no more than 20 minutes. So rather than discussing the many ways in which I feel we've shit the bed thus far in the millennium, I'm going to share with you that which caused me to come to this conclusion in the first place: the Leonard Cohen song "Famous Blue Raincoat."

Steeped as we are in technology, no one has yet penned a song that approaches the brilliance of "Famous Blue Raincoat." Drowning though we are in the kind of utterly depressing turns of events that you'd think would be rocket fuel to the poets and artists of our time, blasting us all to the nether reaches of folk song awesomeness, nobody's even coming close to "Famous Blue Raincoat." Seriously. Not even close. And most days, it seems like nobody's even trying.

The White Stripes? It's a new year, so let's get honest, people.

Analogcabin @ 10:57 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------


2003 - 2007 © TPKI, LLC
All Rights Reserved

CONTACT



BUY A SOUVENIR

BUY ME A GIFT






ADVERTISING

Hate customers?
Advertise on THE SPOONBENDER.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com